" This is like how you can run Microsoft Windows on your computer without having access to Microsoft Windows source code." While county officials attempted to remedy the record on the Senate's concerns, Monday's conference comes days after misinformation began flowing on social media. The confidential group running the audit's social networks accounts published on Twitter on May 12 that the directory they declared was deleted was a "spoliation of proof." The tweet was shared about 14,000 times and the claim was spread by right-wing media.
Richer stated at Monday's conference that Fann's letter raising issues and questions reveals "a complete detachment from the audit's process and its absence of understanding about election procedures." Sellers, at the meeting's close, stated: "I simply want to make it clear, I will not be reacting to any more demands from this sham process.
All of us eagerly anticipate it." Fann on Monday afternoon protected the audit, stating it is "about election integrity and answering the concerns and worries our constituents have." This Piece Covers It Well stated that she had just received the county's letter which Senate management will review and react at a 1 p. m. meeting Tuesday, which will be livestreamed.
County: Missing out on files may be due to professional mistake, The audit has three main parts: the full recount and examination of 2. 1 million tallies, an assessment of the county's vote counting devices, and a review of voter rolls. While Cyber Ninjas is leading the audit, numerous subcontractors are doing the work.
Fann's letter claimed the county deleted a directory site of files, in addition to the "primary database for all election-related information for the November 2020 general election." She said it appeared those files would matter under the Senate's subpoenas. She consisted of a screenshot showing a list of more than 28 missing directories or files.
The supervisors had county IT workers evaluate the screenshot and respond in information to why each directory might be showing up as missing out on, even though the county provided all data requested under the subpoenas. Overall, the managers wrote in their letter to Fann, it appears the professionals used a program to attempt to determine missing files, and when they discovered some, they automatically assumed that the county had deleted them.
0 
Star